304 North Cardinal St. Dorchester Center, MA 02124
500 Ton per Day Rural Sewage Treatment Monitoring
Application background
Location: Countryside Sichuan, China
Rural sewage treatment plants are small in scale (usually with a treatment capacity of less than 500 tons/day) and have low influent organic matter concentrations (COD is often less than 150 mg/L), resulting in insufficient carbon sources during microbial denitrification, which seriously affects the effects of nitrogen removal and phosphorus removal. The traditional manual dosing method has several apparent drawbacks: Operators must estimate the dosage based on experience and use an intermittent dosing mode, which not only results in poor dosing accuracy (with errors reaching ±30%) but also requires a dedicated person to be on duty 24 hours a day. This extensive management results in a carbon source utilization rate of less than 40% and an annual increase in labor costs of approximately 20,000 to 30,000 yuan. What’s more serious is that it is impossible to adjust the dosage in real time according to changes in the influent load, resulting in large fluctuations in the effluent water quality (TN concentration fluctuation range 2-8 mg/L), which not only increases the waste of reagents, but also makes it difficult to stably meet the Class A emission standards, significantly increasing the comprehensive operating costs of village and town sewage treatment.
By arranging sensors at the water inlet, anoxic tank, aerobic tank, and outlet, the reaction conditions at each stage of the sewage treatment process can be controlled in real time. After installing sensors at the water inlet, the water quality of the incoming water is monitored in real time. Through the monitoring data, the central control system dynamically adjusts the carbon source supplement to save the cost of medicine. After installing sensors at the anoxic tank, aerobic tank, and outlet, the water quality during treatment is monitored in real time, the progress of sewage treatment is judged, the inlet and outlet are dynamically adjusted, the idle time of the equipment is reduced, the cost is reduced and the efficiency is increased, and the effluent quality is guaranteed to meet the discharge standards.
Comparison between traditional SBR System and Water Sensor
Comparison Aspects
Traditional Time-controlled SBR System
Intelligent Control and Optimization Based on Sensors
Operation Tie
12h
6-10h (dynamic adjustment according to water quality)
Energy Consumption
5.1kW/(m3s Sewage)
2.0-4.0kW/(m3 Sewage) (dynamic adjustment according to water quality)
Water Quality
COD: 30-40mg/L NH3-N: 0.1-2mg/L TN: 10-13mg/L
COD: 30-40mg/L NH3-N: 0.1-1mg/L TN: 8-10mg/L
Average Monthly Water Treatment Volume
18m3
27m3
Average Daily Electricity Cost
475
392
Average Daily Chemical Cost
348
217
Summary: Through intelligent sensor optimization, the duration of a single cycle was shortened by 12%- 50%, energy consumption was reduced by 20%- 60%, the monthly treated water volume increased by about 30%, various data were comprehensively optimized, and there was no significant fluctuation in the effluent COD, ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen.